Content density chart of this comparison: words in each answer against websites cited
← Library · Model comparisons Model comparison · web search

Which AI model searches the web better on a Japan factory-location question?

We gave 12 AI models the same question with web search on. This page measures how far each model searched and whether the pages it cited back what it wrote. It compares the models, not their advice.

AI-generated · unverified · asked 7 and 8 Oct 2026 · links checked 31 Oct 2026

The test question

As asked, word for word.

Give me the top 5 location where I can incorporate an entity in Japan as a food manufacturer. Consider the government subsidy as well.

Output condition

  • Include fact links after the paragraph or sentence

The question needs current, local sources: subsidy caps, rates, and deadlines that prefectures and cities publish in Japanese. It tests whether a model finds those pages and quotes them correctly.

Measured · content density

Which model researched further?

37 websitesQwen3.8-Omni-Flash, the widest search
13 to 14Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5 and Qwen3.8-Max
1 websiteGemini 3.6: all five links go to jetro.go.jp
One dot per answer with links. Across: answer length in words. Up: distinct websites cited. A dot high on the chart drew on more sources. The shape is the vendor. Hover or tab to a dot for its numbers. 5 answers have no links in the saved copy and are not drawn.
Show as a table
AnswerWordsWebsites cited

More websites means the model looked further. It does not mean the answer is right. The next chart checks that.

Measured · cited links checked

Which answer holds up as written?

We opened every cited link and compared the page with the passage that cites it. A passage is backed when every figure, name, date, and condition in it is on the page.

65 of 95passages fully backed, in the ten answers that link beside the claim
26partly backed: the program is real, a figure or date is not on the page
4passages on a dead link, or contradicted by the page
One row per answer, one square per cited link. Rows run from the highest verified share down. A longer row rests on more links: a 7-link answer that holds up in full is thinner evidence than a 29-link one. Squares run verified, then wrong, then broken. Hover a row for its breakdown, or a square for its citation number.

What the check caught

  • Grok 4.7: a factor of ten.It puts combined Fukui support at ¥5 to 8 billion. Its own source lists 5〜8億円, which is ¥0.5 to 0.8 billion.
  • Opus 5.5: a closing date.It says the SME growth subsidy round closes 29 October. The listing it cites gives 12 November.
  • Qwen3.8-Max: AI citing AI.Four of its six cited passages rest on other AI answers in this library. Its Shizuoka ranking contradicts the report it cites.
  • Gemini 3.6: figures without a page.Four of five passages carry caps or rates that its JETRO links do not show.
Our reading · Dorado's view, not a measurement

What this means when you pick a model for research.

  1. Breadth is not accuracy.

    Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash cited 37 websites, the most, but in a list at the end. No claim in it can be traced to one link. Qwen3.8-Max cited 13 websites, and four of its six passages lean on other AI answers.

  2. Ask for the link beside each claim.

    Ten answers put the link next to the sentence. That is what made them checkable: 65 of their 95 cited passages hold up in full.

  3. Check the number, not just the program.

    Most misses were one figure. The subsidy exists, but the cap, the rate, or the date is not on the page. Open the page before a number goes into your plan.

  4. Links age fast.

    Three weeks after the answers were saved, seven cited pages no longer opened. Subsidy rounds also open and close, so check the dates on the page itself.

All 17 answers

Every answer, with its numbers.

ModelSettingWordsWebsitesPassages checkedBackedPartlyNot backed
Opus 5.5AnthropicMedium1,16713191342
Sonnet 5.5AnthropicMedium904148620
GPT-6 LunaOpenAIMax50957520
GPT-6.1 SolOpenAIMax1,1409161330
GPT-6 AstraOpenAIMax1,0888141130
Gemini 3.6GoogleThinking61215140
Grok 4.7xAI · run 1Fast744–No links in the saved copy
Grok 4.7xAI · run 2 · source listFast71379522
Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba · run 1Thinking545–No links in the saved copy
Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba · run 2Thinking587136051
Qwen3.7-PlusAlibaba · run 1Fast616–No links in the saved copy
Qwen3.7-PlusAlibaba · run 2Fast985–No links in the saved copy
Qwen3.8-Omni-FlashAlibaba · run 1Thinking1,174–No links in the saved copy
Qwen3.8-Omni-FlashAlibaba · run 2 · source listThinking1,91437726516
Haiku 5.5AnthropicMedium48576510
Haiku 5.5AnthropicExtra69397511
GPT-6 SolOpenAIMax64687610

The charts use run 2 of the four models that ran twice. Each run 1 has no links in the saved copy. In the build, each row opens the answer in full. Each model name opens that answer in full.

The research plan
$50 first month, then $200 a month

Want the sources checked for your product?

These answers are unchecked. In the research plan, we open the sources, check the dates, and correct what is wrong before the brief reaches you.