Content density chart of this comparison: words in each answer against websites cited
← Library · Model comparisons Model comparison · web search

Which AI model searches the web better on a Japanese food-quotation question?

We gave eight AI models the same question about quoting food products to a Japanese retailer and a wholesaler. This page measures how far each answer searched and whether the pages it cited back what it wrote. It compares the models, not their advice.

AI-generated · unverified · asked 9 Oct 2026 · links checked 31 Oct 2026

The test question

As asked, word for word.

we received a request for quotation from both retailer and wholesaler in Japan for our food products, which we already have an OEM production center in Japan. I know basic quotation terms and conditions, but anything particular things and business culture that I have to be carefully aware of?

I want to outsmart our competitors including domestics ones, so search and suggest me the best options possible. I'm open to WACKY ideas as long as it brings significant value to the retailer and wholesaler.

Output condition

  • Include fact links after the paragraph or sentence

The question asks for Japanese business culture and for ideas that beat competitors. Rules on payment, returns, and delivery are published by Japanese government and trade bodies. The ideas are the model's own. It tests whether a model finds the pages on trade practice and keeps its own proposals apart from what those pages say.

Measured · content density

Which model researched further?

17 websitesGLM-5.3, the widest search
15 websitesDeepSeek, in 896 words
4 websitesGPT-6 Luna at High, the narrowest search, in 2,529 words
One dot per answer. Across: answer length in words. Up: distinct websites cited. A dot high on the chart drew on more sources. The shape is the vendor. Hover or tab to a dot for its numbers.
Show as a table
AnswerWordsWebsites cited

More websites means the model looked further. It does not mean the answer is right. The next chart checks that.

Measured · cited links checked

Which answer holds up as written?

We opened every cited link and compared the page with the passage that cites it. A passage is backed when every figure, name, date, and condition in it is on the page.

63 of 97passages fully backed, in the six answers that link beside the claim
16partly backed: the page covers the topic, but a figure, date, or condition is not on it
18passages not backed: a dead link, a page we could not open, or a page that does not mention the claim
One row per answer, one square per cited link. Rows run from the highest verified share down. A longer row rests on more links: a 7-link answer that holds up in full is thinner evidence than a 29-link one. Squares run verified, then wrong, then broken. Hover a row for its breakdown, or a square for its citation number.

What the check caught

  • DeepSeek: a Korean rule given as Japan's.It says imported OEM products must show an OEM label beside the country of origin. The Consumer Affairs Agency document it cites describes South Korea's labeling system. It also gives center fees as 10 to 15% of the price and says 52.5% of supermarkets ask for them. The 2013 Japan Fair Trade Commission report it cites has neither figure, and its other source would not open.
  • GLM-5.3: right page, wrong reader.Two passages quote First Agri columns, and the pages do say it: volume discounts from 0 to 5% up to 28 to 35%, and 100% advance payment on the first orders. Those columns describe the terms matcha suppliers give overseas buyers. GLM-5.3 presents them as typical Japanese food wholesale pricing and payment terms.
  • Gemini 3.6: no passage fully backed.Its four passages cite five pages, and two of them are about something else. A foodservice market report is cited for shelf-ready packaging and staff training in retail. A guide to finding a distributor is cited for the sustainability targets of Seven & i and Aeon.
  • Qwen3.7-Plus: AI citing AI.One passage, which says an OEM plant is an advantage, rests only on the AI Report Library's page for this question. That page shows other AI answers. Another passage cites a U.S. Commercial Service guide for small-lot, just-in-time delivery, which the guide does not discuss.
Our reading · Dorado's view, not a measurement

What this means when you pick a model for research.

  1. Breadth and backing did not go together.

    GPT-6 Luna at High cited 4 websites, and 18 of its 20 passages hold up in full. DeepSeek cited 15, and 3 of its 14 do. GLM-5.3 cited 17, and 27 of its 39 do. The website count says how far a model looked, not what the pages say.

  2. A list at the end is hard to check.

    Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.7-Plus put their links in a source list. The list ties an entry to a claim only by domain name or reference number. 4 of their 19 passages hold up in full, against 63 of 97 in the six answers that link beside the claim. Ask for the link beside each claim.

  3. Pages go missing.

    Three weeks after the answers were asked, four cited pages return 'not found'. DeepSeek and GLM-5.3 have two such passages each. Another 12 passages cite pages we could not open.

  4. A match is not a fit.

    The check grades whether a page carries the text. It does not grade whether the text applies to a food supplier quoting a Japanese retailer. Check who a page was written for before you rely on its figure.

All 8 answers

Every answer, with its numbers.

ModelSettingWordsWebsitesPassages checkedBackedPartlyNot backed
GPT-6 LunaOpenAIHigh2,5294201811
GPT-6.1 SolOpenAIHigh2,06810151410
Gemini 3.6GoogleThinking1,02654022
Grok 4.7xAI · source listFast1,04199270
Qwen3.8-MaxAlibabaThinking555115131
Qwen3.7-PlusAlibaba · source listThinking7621010235
DeepSeekDeepSeekDeepThink8961514365
GLM-5.3Z.aiNot selected3,38717392739

DeepSeek, GLM-5.3, GPT-6 Luna, Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.7-Plus each have an earlier saved copy that the library replaced with a corrected one at the same address. The table shows the corrected copy. Each model name opens that answer in full. Each model name opens that answer in full.

The research plan
$50 first month, then $200 a month

Want the sources checked for your product?

These answers are unchecked. In the research plan, we open the sources, check the dates, and correct what is wrong before the brief reaches you.